MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF DIRECTION FOR
IMPROVEMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DAIRYING STATISTICS DURING 11-12 OCTOBER 2007 AT SHILLONG
The meeting of the “Technical Committee of Direction for Improvement of Animal Husbandry and Dairying Statistics (TCD)” was held during 11th and 12th October 2007 at I.C.A.R. Complex, Barapani, Umiam, Rhi Bhoi District, Meghalaya.
The list of participants is given at Appendix –C.
Dr. S.K Bandopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries (DAHDF), Government of India (GOI) had chaired the meeting and addressed the participants about the perspective of livestock sector vis a vis its Statistics. Shri. O.P. Misra, Adviser (Statistics), DAHDF, GOI welcomed the participants and told the house about the priorities of the Livestock Sector Statistics and Integrated Sample Survey Scheme. Shri W.M.S. Pariat, Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya was Chief Guest in the meeting. He delivered the inaugural address elucidating the importance of relevant statistics for development of economy of any nation. Dr. S.D. Sharma, Director, IASRI has expressed his keen observations on the Integrated Sample Survey methodology and scheme while addressing the participants. Dr. D. Khonglah, Director, Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, Government of Meghalaya had given vote of thanks. Shri D.K.Dkhar, Commissioner and Secretary, AH & Veterinary, Government of Meghalaya and Dr. S.V. Ngachan, Director, ICAR, Research Complex for North-Eastern Hill Region, Meghalaya had also graced the occasion.
On the first day, inauguration of the meeting took place by presentation of bouquets to the chief guest followed by persons on the dias. Shri. O.P. Misra, Advisor (Statistics) and Co-Chairman, TCD welcomed the dignitaries, members of TCD meeting, State representatives and other invitees of the meeting. He emphasized the need of timely and reliable statistics with scientific projections for formulation of realistic and effective policy/programme. He also pointed out that supervision of data collection mechanism is essential to provide quality data. He urged that training courses and other mechanism of interaction may be developed to induce commitments and to get the feed back. He thanked the dignitaries for sparing their valuable time for the TCD meeting and opined that the discussions in this meeting will surely develop ideas in improving the database in Livestock Sector.
Dr. S.D. Sharma, Director, IASRI and Co-Chairman TCD has stressed upon the appropriate planning, policy making and implementation of the same for an increased growth rate of 8 % in GDP. He also stressed upon the need to address the socio-economic issues related with proper use of byproduct of livestock sectors. Dr. Sharma has emphasized on bringing out the estimate of MLP at further down than that at the district level, by adopting newer techniques of small area estimation for micro level planning. He had shown his concern on the existing data gaps in the livestock sector. He told that, for ensuring reliability of estimates, estimation of standard error is needed. He had also drawn the attention of the house to the point that live stock census covers a large number of parameters on which data are collected which increases the amount of non sampling errors in the data. He suggested that whenever there is a plan to increase /add some new parameters in the census we need to decrease/ drop the other not so relevant ones in order to keep the non-sampling errors under control. He suggested that the number of products on which data are to be collected through Integrated Sample Survey might be increased, but for doing so, the norms of staffing of the scheme should be vigorously adhered to. Speaking on the lack of man power at work under the Scheme, he urged that State and UTs should fill up vacant positions of the Staff under the ISS scheme.
Dr. S.K Bandopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Government of India delivered the key-note address giving detail of his observations on the growing importance of livestock sector in the Indian Economy. While reviewing the position of India as a largest producer of milk, he emphasized that there is a lot that needs to be done to increase the average productivity of milk to reach the world average. He deliberated upon the various important problems of livestock sector such as inadequate breeding structure, poor genetic material, perennial problem of feed and fodder, accessibility of credit & market and prevalent animal diseases. He observed that for planning to combat these problems, there is a need to have a sound statistical system. He showed his concern for developing database on conception rate of livestock and survival rate of calves, which is prerequisite for maintaining a productive stock. He pointed out the urgent need to study the feed and fodder requirement of livestock and asked the State/UTs to come forward in taking more number of studies on various subjects that can fill the data gaps of this sector. He had impressed upon the need of timely and quality data for a sound planning. He had stressed upon the matter that the State/UTs should fill up the staff of the Integrated Sample Survey Scheme according to the norms of the Scheme, on 50:50 sharing basis so that increased demand for data on livestock sector can be met. Periodical training of the Statistical staff at the States/ UTs are also needed for increasing the accountability and ensuring timely dissemination of the quality of data.
Shri W.M.S. Pariat, Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya in his address as a Chief Guest observed that Barapani in Meghalaya would be a home for the participants away from their homes and it is going to be a history that for the first time in north –eastern region of India, such an All India Technical Committee of Direction was going to meet there. He emphasized that meaningful Statistics should be collected with great accuracy and should be published within its timeframe as this is essential for any planning process. He admitted the task is not simple as collection of Statistics is a difficult task. Moreover, expertise of collecting a reliable Statistics is in realm of only a selected few. Interaction of persons differs from person to person and hence collection of Statistics become a subjective matter. In order to improve this skill and to bring more and more quality interaction with objectivity in perspective, there is need to impart regular trainings in data collection, processing, validation and its dissemination. Statistics should be relevant and appropriate, meaningful and timely. Computer technology is of great use for all these things. He praised the efforts of Animal Husbandry Department for publications of estimates of large number of Characteristics of livestock sector in timely manner. He observed that in Animal Husbandry Statistics, whatever is produced is put to use. He hoped that current TCD meeting would come out with clear guidelines / recommendations which would go a long way in further improving Statistical System of livestock sector and enable practical approaches to Statisticians leading to fulfillment of various needs of planners. He thanked all the States/ UTs for participating and wished that their participation will surely benefit the agenda of the TCD.
Dr. D. Khonglah, Director, Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, Government of Meghalaya had given vote of thanks. He thanked all the participants, ICAR, IASRI, CSO, NIC and to each and every individual who helped in arranging the All India TCD Shillong 2007 at Barapani, Meghalaya besides thanking Chief Guest, Guests and persons on the dais. Special thanks were bestowed upon the Chairman of the meeting.
2. The agenda wise discussion and decision taken therein are as follows:
Agenda 1: Action Taken Report on the last TCD meeting held at Pune
during October 5-6, 2006
The progress on various items was provided to participants. The ATR was approved.
Agenda 2 : Release of production estimates of milk, egg, wool and
meat of the year 2006-07
Dr. Vishnu Kant Srivastava
Director DAHDF introduced the agenda and gave the brief background. He
mentioned that receipt of estimates by due dates needs improvement. He
summarized the estimates that were received for milk, egg, meat and wool. The
estimates from two major States viz. Jharkhand and Jammu and Kashmir were not
received. Other States and UTs from where these estimates were not available
were Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu.
Out of these Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland had submitted their production
estimates but for their inconsistent componentwise estimates. House decided that the estimates from the
last year may be substituted for the States, who had not submitted them till
their estimates are received. These should be replaced by their actual
estimates once they are received. Adviser (Statistics) was authorized by the
house to approve them for further release at All India level. Fifteen days time
after closure of TCD meeting, as usual, was given to the States/UTs for sending
their corrections pertaining to any omissions and commissions in respect of
their States/ UTs so that minutes of meeting may contain up to date information
in all respect. Jharkhand had sent their estimates and these are included
whereas the estimates of Jammu and Kashmir were not received leading to estimates
of major livestock products for 2006-07 as provisional ones at national level.
Along with agenda notes, workbook was also supplied. The workbook contained the
data on many items like targets, refresher training course, component wise
breakups of production estimates of major livestock products and infrastructure
& AI data as on 31/03/2007, Milch Animals Statistics and formats prescribed
for sending the MLP data, FRBM reports and UC reports to the GOI. It also contained Unspent Balances (UB)
lying with the States/UTs in respect of ISS Scheme with their year-wise
breakups. Feedback forms were also distributed to the participants for
their comments to be submitted to the TCD-Shillong 2007Agenda Co-ordinator.
There were detailed
discussions for each of the State/UTs for the major livestock products. Most of
the States, who earlier could not send their estimates, had provided their
estimates. Component wise estimates of milk were not available from Jammu &
Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman and
Diu. Estimates for the States/ UTs Jammu & Kashmir, Dadra & Nagar
Haveli and Daman and Diu were
substituted from previous years as these estimates were not available from them
and are not sent to the Department within the stipulated time of fifteen days
of closure of TCD meeting. Milk production for 2006-07 at national level is
estimated provisionally as 100.9 million tonnes (3.9 % growth with respect to
97.1 million tonnes milk production of the 2005-06) with the Statewise breakup
given at tables 1
& 2
in Appendix-A.
Fall in Milk production is noticed for Delhi and Nagaland, the per
capita availability at national level has increased to 246 g. per day.
Estimates of egg production
were discussed at length. Extreme rise
was noticed in the production estimates of Gujarat, Haryana, Orissa, Tamil
Nadu, A&Nicobar Islands whereas fall is noticed in the States and UTs of
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Rajasthan, Assam (marginally only), Sikkim and
Delhi. The national level estimates were arrived at substituting the values of
last year estimates in the case of the States/UTs of J&K, Arunachal
Pradesh, Nagaland, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. The estimates of
these States/Uts are hence not available component-wise. The total egg
production for the year 2006-07 is estimated provisionally at 50.7 billion
numbers with the growth of around 9.6 % with respect to 46.2 billion numbers of
the egg production of 2005-06. The per capita availability had increased to 50
eggs per annum. The State-wise component wise breakup is given at tables 1
& 3 of Appendix –A.
Estimates of Meat production
were discussed. During 2006-07, more than five percent growth in meat
production from recognized sector is shown by the States/UTs of A.P, Haryana,
H.P., Karnataka, Kerala (heavy increase), Orissa, Punjab (very heavy increase
due to increase in coverage of estimation by inclusion of buffalo and poultry meat
production in their estimates), Tamil Nadu (heavy increase), Uttarakhand,
Assam, Mizoram, Delhi and Puducherry (heavy increase) whereas Gujarat, West
Bengal (heavy decline), Meghalaya and Chandigarh have shown decline. Meat estimates of recognized sector at
national level provisionally estimated at 2.3 million tonnes with static growth
from 2005-06 estimates that were also at 2.3 million tonnes. Haryana estimates
of 2005-06 were corrected at 7.3271 thousand tonnes with their component wise
breakups now made available. Rajasthan estimates for 2005-06 have also been
incorporated because of them being made available. These revised estimates of
2005-06 are given in the Addendum as modification to table 57 of Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics 2006 (BAHS
2006). The house also felt that these comparisons cannot signify any
comparisons across the States/UTs; they are just signifying their own
States/UTs comparisons over the different periods of times. It is so as
coverage is from recognized sectors only and hence is varying over States/UTs
to States/UTs. The State-wise component wise breakup of is given at tables 1 & 4 of Appendix
–A.
Like the estimates of
2005-06, Wool production estimates for 2006-07 has registered again stability
at national level when compared to last years’ estimates. In some of the
states, wool production decreased very rapidly. They are Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand,
Madhya Pradesh, Punjab (heavy decline) and Sikkim while at the same time, some
states have shown increasing trend. Important ones are AP, Bihar, Maharashtra,
Rajasthan and West Bengal. Punjab has not included wool production estimates
from slaughterhouses which it did in the estimates of 2005-06. Jammu Kashmir
estimates were not available, hence last years estimates were substituted for
them. The estimates of Tamil Nadu were based on projections done by the State
and therefore, their component wise estimates were not available. Estimates of
Arunachal Pradesh also did not contain component wise breakups as the States
breakups were inconsistent with the model of ISS Scheme. The national level
estimates of Wool production for the year 2006-07 is found at 45.1 million Kg
with 0.45 % growth over 2005-06. The State-wise component wise breakup of is
given at tables 1 & 5 of Appendix –A.
Number of Milch Animals for
2006-07 were also discussed in the house. They are given at table 6 of Appendix –A.
The States marked “-“ were asked to provide their estimates and till that time
it may be read as not available.
Agenda 3: 18th Livestock Census 2007
Shri Nand Lal Director took
up the agenda of Livestock Census. In view of the experience of Seventeenth
Census, finalization of all technical details well before the plan scheme of
18th livestock census was prepared and approved by the Government of India. The
house deliberated extensively on various aspects like further planning,
schedule movement, field data collection, supervision, data entry, training,
data processing, tabulation and release of results. Enumeration for the 18th
Livestock census had started in the country. Status of enumeration work in
various states was reviewed in detail and plan of action & strategy to be
adopted for scrutiny of data and its computerization was also discussed. The states were informed that common
software is being developed by Government of India
for data entry and data processing. This software will be used in all the
states uniformly. The states were also suggested to identify the place where
they would like to get their data entry done. It was also suggested that the
larger states may get their data computerized in the district head quarters
while smaller state/UTs might get their data entered at State head quarter or
some other appropriate centralized place. States were also suggested that if
they find any difficulty in getting their data entered through their own
available staff/machinery, they can go for its outsourcing. In case of
outsourcing the work of data entry, the agency should be identified. The
participating states informed that field work had started and in most of the
cases field work would be completing as per the census
calendar circulated by the Government of India. State representative from
Chhattisgarh has intimated that field works in the tribal areas would get
delayed by 15 days. In Maharashtra field work had started from 1st October
except in the Mumbai where field work had started from 8th October. Gujarat and
Haryana had selected the agencies through which they would get their data
entered. However, other states were yet to identify such agencies. States have
also informed that sample checks were also being done. Most of the states
intimated that they were finding problem in utilization of unspent amount and
getting the supervision work carried smoothly as the rate of honorarium to be
given to the supervisors and to the other components of Census work had yet not
been finalized and intimated to them. The States/UTs were informed that the
norms of expenditure for various items of work related to the
census including the honorarium rates to be given to the enumerator and
supervisor would be informed soon after its EFC is approved by GOI.
AGENDA No. 4: Staffing Position of Statistical persons in States/UTs
As per the norms of Scheme,
the States/UTs did not adequately fill the staff positions of the ISS Scheme.
House witnessed that only 25 % posts are filled up and rests are lying vacant.
House, while deliberating on the subject felt that data collection mechanism
and its quality are linked. Proper supervision of data collection mechanism is
essential. It is seen that some States/UT administration are keeping top
leadership of data collection system either paralyzed or in vacuum resulting in
lower functionaries of data collection in confusion and lesser committed to
their primary work and aims. It is seen that the State/UT where statistical
system is provided with effective leaders at the top are performing better in
terms of quality and timeliness than those who are having relatively larger
number of data collectors with no top leadership for the statistical system.
Supervision is the only tool to ensure better quality data. Therefore,
States/UTs are asked to take necessary actions in this regard. They should
periodically inform the DAHDF about their staff positions and reasons for not
filling up of the vacant posts under ISS Scheme.
AGENDA No. 5: XI Five year Plan proposals for ISS Scheme
States expressed that it
should be funded 100% for ISS Scheme in order to have no burden on the States,
thereby leading to complete filling up of the required posts. NER States
especially from Mizoram even it was also felt that the office expenses should
also be funded besides the salary. Costs of holding meeting of districts at
States Hq or zonal offices for reviewing the work of ISS Scheme on periodical
basis should also be funded. Districts must be strengthened in order to have a
better Statistical System. Computer Systems of the ISS Scheme should be
strengthened periodically by upgrading the same through provisions of funds for
hardware, software and trainings. Some relatively big States like Karnataka
also expressed that provision of vehicle for the ISS Scheme at State Hq. Level
should also be made by providing funds for its purchase. It is also felt that
the States/ UTs should organize refresher-training courses on regular basis and
the ISS Scheme should provide money for the same.
AGENDA No. 6: Data on Infrastructure and Artificial Insemination
Data on infrastructure and
Artificial Insemination are very much part of the ISS Scheme. Therefore, the
persons responsible for conducting ISS Scheme are also to pay attention to keep
this data updated at least once in a year. This data is to be reported with a
reference date of 31st March, 2008. In January the States must issue notices to
all their districts to update this data and by month of April, the States/UTs
should be in a position to have their data updated. The validated data complete
in all respect should be sent to GOI by first week of May, 2008. Only firm
values should be sent to GOI. While reporting the data of Infrastructure and AI
for the State to GOI, the earlier year’s data should be taken into account in
order to allocate reasons for higher increase/ decrease. The updated data on
Infrastructure and AI is given at table 7 of Appendix –A.
AGENDA No. 7: Time Table & format for sending the ISS data to
Center
After detailed
deliberations, the house decided that the seasonal estimates should be
furnished within one and half month after the closure of the season. It is also
felt that States/UTs should not bring their data to public domain by publishing
their estimates of MLP before TCD meeting makes approval. They, however, are
allowed to circulate or use the same for departmental use for Government(s)/
Government bodies/ bonafide users through restricted circulations. It was also
insisted that the MLP estimates should be sent to GOI in prescribed format, which
was circulated along the Agenda notes. The same is again being circulated
through these minutes as is given at format 1
of Appendix –B.
AGENDA No. 8: Any other item with the permission of Chair
Utilization
Statistics
For Utilisation Statistics
of milk, egg and dung at production stage, the tabulation at national level
with transparency about the reliability of the estimates would be possible if
primary tables as prescribed in last TCD meeting at Pune, is prepared and
submitted in the same manner as is being done by the States/ UTs for production
estimates of major livestock products. It was observed that only a few
States/UTs had started giving the same in the manner it is asked. The
States/UTs will be benefited on all counts of receipt of their MLP estimates
well in time and creation of primary tables for utilization ready and improved
quality of data because of increased accountability if they make the
arrangement mandatory in their States that each district will send these
primary tables to them on regular monthly basis say by first week to the
State/UT hq. It was also insisted that the primary table of Utilisation
Statistics should be sent to GOI in prescribed format, which was circulated
along the Agenda notes. The same is again being circulated through these
minutes as is given at format 2 of Appendix –B.
Studies
under ISS Scheme
Special studies on data gaps
on meat production from unorganized sector, input survey for buffalo and cost
of production of milk were given to Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra
with the approved cost of Rs Two Lakh ninty six thousand, Rs Eight lakh ninty
three thousand and Rs ninty nine thousand respectively. Studies taken by Tamil
Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra had progressed well. Tamil Nadu had submitted
its report and Maharashtra had intimated that study report was under
preparation. House was informed that more and more States should come forward
for having the studies done in their States. Offer was also given to Institutes
of repute like IASRI to come forward directly for getting such studies funded
from the DAHDF, GOI.
Unspent
Balance under ISS Scheme
For running any scheme
effectively, its regular and proper funding is very essential. As everybody is
aware this needs submission of financial statements, utilization certificates,
FRBM statements in time and in proper format. Ministry of Finance is very
particular about timely submission of utilisation of money released for the
schemes. All the states should make an endeavor for timely submission of
utilisation certificate in prescribed format without fail. Moreover, money
released for the schemes should be utilized. Revalidating the unutilized money
again and again not only embarrasses the Department in the eyes of Ministry of
Finance but also dilute the very objective of the scheme. Some States have provided their UCs during the TCD. House expressed
concerns over Unspent balances still lying unutilized with the States
particularly with them like J&K and Punjab where this money is held up from
last several years. It was also insisted that the FRBM statements on monthly
basis should be invariably sent to GOI in prescribed format, which was
circulated along the Agenda notes and the same is again being circulated
through these minutes as is given at format 3
of Appendix –B.
Anticipated
Achievements, Targets and Projections
Anticipated Achievements for
2007-08, Targets for 2008-09 and Projections for three years for 2009-10 to
2011-12 for the Major Livestock Products Milk, Egg, Meat and Wool were
deliberated upon
|
|
Milk (m.t.) |
Egg (b.n.) |
Wool (m. Kg.) |
Meat (m.t.) |
|
Anticipated Ach.2007-08 |
102 |
51 |
45 |
2.3 |
|
Target
2008-09 |
105 |
54 |
45 |
2.4 |
Milch
Animals 1999-00 to 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06
The estimates of milch
animals of in respect of old years 1999-00 to 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 also
came up for discussion. Dr. Shubhra Sarker Deputy Director took up this agenda
and house has discussed it in great detail. Since livestock Census had taken
place in 2003, the estimates of ISS for the year 2003-04 should be replaced by
the Census estimates as they are more reliable because of their complete
coverage. These estimates could be published after giving fifteen days time
from the closure of current TCD meeting so that the corrections, if any, reported
by the States could be accommodated also. The State-wise component wise
estimates of Milch Animals of CB Cattle, ND Cattle, Buffalo and Goats for these
years is given at Table 9 of Appendix –A. For the States marked “-“, the
estimates are to be read as “not available”. It was also discussed that the
estimates of Milch animals for the States/UTs of Gujarat for Crossbreed Cattle,
Himachal Pradesh for Goat, Kerala for Buffalo, Nagaland for all the animals
types, Orissa for Goat, Punjab for Non-descript Cattle and Tamil Nadu for all
animal types are to be confirmed by the concerned States as they are variant
with respect to census estimates. If corrections are received within stipulated
time of fifteen days, they can be incorporated in the data. It is also felt
that theses estimates are now final and can be published leading to closure of
this agenda for further TCDs.
Index of Service Production
(ISP) for Veterinary Services Sector
The necessity of this new
statistics was discussed before the house. Participating States had intimated
that there could be data available on number of cases treated both for
preventive and curative aspects. It was also felt that cases for birds and
animals should be separately spelt out as otherwise it will be misleading if
across the States these values were compared by any user agency. There were two
parts of submission of this data. The first part was for last five years
(from 2002-03 to 2006-07) in order to
enable the CSO to create a base of this data and another was the time bound
flow of quarterly data on number of cases treated from 2006-07. It was decided
that the ISP data on quarterly basis should be sent to GOI in prescribed format
that is being circulated through these minutes and as is given at format 4 of
Appendix –B. The data for base years 2002-03 to 2005-07 was approved with “-“
as “not received” given at table 8 of Appendix –A.
3. Recommendations
of TCD Shillong 2007
.
1)
The estimate of major
livestock products for the year 2006-07, as given in Tables-1 to 5 with the
States/UTs marked “#” as provisional, having national estimates also at
provisional till these estimates are replaced by the actual estimates to be
furnished by the concerned States/UTs.
2)
Estimates of Milch Animals are approved with “-“ as
not available given at Tables 6 and 9. The agenda is now complete for table 9 (
years 1999-00 to 2005-06 ) and is closed for future TCDs.
3)
Data on Infrastructure and AI is approved and is
given at Table –7.1 to 7.3 of Appendix –A.
4)
It was decided that after receipt of clarification/
justification of the production estimates and other Statistics from concerned
States/UTs, Adviser (Statistics) may approve them for further release at All
India level.
5)
The willing remaining States/ UTs will send the
requirement and plan of holding refresher training course in ISS methodologies
for their States/ UTs.
6)
The Studies proposal by the willing States/ UTs may
be sent to DAHDF.
7)
The Estimates of MLP should be sent on seasonal
basis and Seasonal estimates should come preferably within one and half months
(at the most two months) from the closure of the season.
8)
Unspent Balances lying with the States should be
utilized faster, specially for the States who had this fund lying for number of
years
The meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.
Appendix-A: 1. Estimates of Major Livestock Products (MILK, EGG, MEAT & WOOL) for the
Year 2006-07
Table 1 to 5, Annual Average Milch Animals Table 6
2.
Number of Veterinary Institutes
Statewise, State
farms and Infrastructures & Data on Artificial Inseminations Tables- 7.1 to 7.3
3.
Number of Cases treated during 2002-02 to 2006-07 statewise
4.
Estimates of Number of Annual Average Milch Animals 1999-00 to 2002-03& Number of Milch Animals in 2003 as per Livestock Census.
5 Estimates of Number of Annual Average Milch
Animals 2004-05 to 2005-06
1. Format
1- of sending Seasonal, Annual Estimates of MLP to Hq.
2.
Format 2- of sending Utilisation Statistics etc. at production
stage
3.
Format 3- of sending financial/ FRBM return for ISS Scheme by
every month
4.
Format 4- of sending ISP data every quarter and annual
Appendix-C: 1. Participants of TCD meeting 2007- Shillong
Addendum-:
Revised Meat
Production Estimates of 2005-06
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Appendix-A
Format 1 : Statement of Seasonal and Annual Estimates of Major
Livestock Products
|
<state/UTname> |
Period |
|
TO |
|
|
|
SEASON |
|
Year |
|
No.
of days |
|
|
Ref. |
0 |
-- Date |
0 |
|
|
|
MILK |
|
EST. Milch |
ESTIMATED |
Average
yield |
MILK |
|
Srl No. |
Item |
Animals |
Animals
in Milk |
per
day |
Production |
|
|
Animals type |
(in 000) |
(in
000) |
(kg) |
(000
MT.) |
|
1 |
Cows-Exotic |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Cows-NON DESCRIPT |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Buffalo |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Goat |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
EGG |
|
|
ESTIMATED |
Av. Yld Rate |
.EGG |
|
Srl No |
Item |
|
Layers Nos |
No./ layer |
PRODUCTION |
|
|
Birds type |
|
(in 000) |
/day &
(/season) |
(Lakhs Nos) |
|
1 |
DESI Fowls |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Improved
Fowls |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
DESI Duck |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Improved Duck |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
MEAT |
|
|
No.
of Animals |
Ave.
Yield |
. Meat |
|
Srl No |
Item |
|
slaughtered |
Per
animal |
Production |
|
|
Animals type |
|
(in
000) |
(Kg/animal) |
(000
Kgs) |
|
1 |
Cattle |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Buffalo |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Sheep |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Goat |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Pig |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Poultry |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
WOOL |
Item |
|
Est.Sheep shorn |
Average
wool |
WOOL |
|
Srl No |
Animals type |
|
(
Nos.In Lakhs) |
(Kg/animal) |
(000
Kg) |
|
1 |
Rams/Weathers |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ewes |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Lambs |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
