MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF DIRECTION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DAIRYING STATISTICS HELD DURING OCTOBER 05-06, 2006 AT PUNE

 

 

The meeting of the “Technical Committee of Direction for Improvement of Animal Husbandry and Dairying Statistics” (TCD) was held during OCTOBER 5th and 6th, 2006 at VAIKUNTH MEHTA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CO-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT (VMNICOM), University Road, Pune, Maharashtra.

 

The list of participants is given at Appendix-A.

 

1.          Ms. Charusheela Sohoni,  Secretary Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries(DAHDF), Government of India (GOI) was chief guest in the meeting. She addressed the participants. Smt. Leena Mehendale, Principal Secretary, ADF, Government of Maharashtra delivered the inaugural address. Dr S.K. Bandyopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Government of India had given keynote address while Shri Arun Saxena Advisor(Statistics), DAHDF, GOI welcomed the participants. The introduction was made by  Shri Bijay Kumar Commissioner, Animal Husbandry, Government of Maharashtra. Professor S.A. Siddhanti Head of the Center VMNICOM Pune also addressed the participants. Shri C.P. Meshram Addl. Commissioner (AH) had given vote of thanks.

 

On the first day, inauguration of the meeting took place by lighting of the lamp by Smt. Leena Mehendale, Principal Secretary, ADF, Government of Maharashtra followed by persons present on the dias. Sri Arun Saxena, Adviser(Statistics) and  Co-Chairman TCD welcomed the dignitaries, members of TCD meeting and other invitees to the meeting. He thanked the dignitaries for sparing their valuable time for the TCD meeting and opined that their presence and advice will be of great use and significance in improving the statistical system of Animal husbandry  livestock and  related fields.

 

            Shri Bijay Kumar, Commissioner, Animal Husbandry, Government of Maharashtra expressed his happiness for holding All India TCD meeting in PUNE, known as the happening city of India. He felt that by holding TCD meeting in different parts of the country away from Delhi, GOI has really given a greater scope for the State Directors to get the first hand experience on the problems and their possible solutions while keeping themselves free from constraints of being busy in their administrative works. He said that even he could gather lot of inputs from holding of TCD meeting in Pune, which otherwise was missing.  He mentioned that it is really a matter of great pride that many States Directors, Commissioners and Secretaries of the AH Department of other States were present at Pune TCD meeting which will go a long way in strengthening the statistical system in livestock sector. At the same time it also shows presence of keen interest in livestock statistics by the participating States. Reiterating the practical use of the Statistics, he recalled the incidence of bird flue ingress in Maharashtra when he used the data of livestock census 2003 and found it by and large a useful database. However, he felt that there is need to provide missing linkages, if purpose of data-use differs from the one for which the data system is primarily generated. He felt that strength derived due to participation of Secretary (DAHDF) GOI and Animal Husbandry Commissioner GOI in TCD meeting will definitely help translate the recommendations of Committee into action. He also mentioned that there are many areas, where the focus needs to be given like  progeny testing, evaluation of breeds on different parameters, evaluation of critical inputs of AI programme, expansion of domain of ISS scheme and web based solutions etc.

 

            Professor S.A.Sidhanti Head of the Center VMNICOM viewed the TCD meeting a focused programme where deliberations will take place in a well-established format. He also told about the mandate of VMNICOM and made every one present aware of Co-operative movement and the role of Late Sri Vaikunth Mehta in its foundation and development. On behalf of VMNICOM, he wished all success to the TCD meeting and pleasant stay to all its participants coming from various States/ UTs of the country.

 

Smt. Leena Mehendale, Principal Secretary, ADF, Government of Maharashtra in her inaugural address expressed her great pleasure that the Government of India has chosen Pune for holding the TCD meeting. She mentioned that the development potential of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (ADF) is tremendous and planners may aspire to attain up to 10 % level of the growth rate. Information is an asset for planning. The ADF sector is very important from food security viewpoint. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry sector should go hand in hand. From energy point of view again, there exists substantial contribution potential from this sector. She suggested for the mapping of Census data which may mean convergence of many departments. Time series analysis and regression analysis should be put to use in order to understand numbers better. Total productivity and strategy for productivity increase will be different for different people. She illustrated this concept by giving the example of sheep rearing activity. It has different dimensions if its aims and hence people involved are different like for those pursuing for the life sustaining activity, for commercial or growth potential activity or for export base increase activity etc. In all such cases, for different people, different strategies of developments would be relevant. She appreciated calling TCD meeting at Pune as the participating officers would be free from all file works and would devote much of their time in deliberations. She wished a great success to the meeting in achieving its goal.

           

On the second day, Ms. Charusheela Sohoni, Secretary Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DAHDF), Government of India (GOI) and Chief Guest stressed the need for timely and reliable statistics on various aspects of Livestock and related sector. She emphasized that this sector has great scope for economic growth specially for agriculture sector as it generates gainful employments, provides food security and encourages the women empowerment. Higher growth rate of 10 % from 6-7 % in animal husbandry can be achieved, provided the right type of investment is made and committed people are put in charge of these sectors. Speaking on lack of suitable human resources with the mandate of getting more work done with less people, she felt that training is an absolute necessity to build up a committed workforce. She recounted the global scenario in the area of food expenditure and deliberated on the perspectives of current livestock census. The trends in the country show that low yielding variety are being replaced by high yielding variety of animals in milk sector. While India is a large producer of milk, country’s productivity is less than half of the world average. She enumerated reasons for low productivity as  (a) poor genetic quality of animals, (b) diseases in animals and (c) inadequate feed and fodder. She felt that if diseases are controlled, productivity can be increased by 20 to 25% She expressed that basic requirement of planning and execution of schemes is to have reliable data. Livestock Census and Integrated Sample Surveys are main sources of livestock data bases. Breed wise data was collected during 17th Livestock Census but only 17 states could get it compiled. There is a need to improve this part of the Census in its conduction and effective management. To get data in a lesser time frame, recent technologies of online data entry and web enabled solutions may be employed. She urged the States/ UTs to fill up the vacant positions of the staff falling under the plan ISS Scheme and at the same time, she also emphasized the need for better management of funds, providing Utilisation Certificates in time and getting benefited by all the components of the scheme through their better planning, management and responses. The refresher training in ISS methodologies is one such component of the ISS Scheme and those States/ UTs who could not take its advantage yet were urged by her to come forward and get benefited by it at the earliest as the 10th five year plan is nearing to an end. She thanked the participants and felt that the Committee will be able to take decisions and give directions which the States/ UTs will translate into actions.

 

Dr. S.K. Bandopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DAHDF), Government of India (GOI) delivered the keynote address giving details of his observations on livestock census.  He reviewed the production estimates of milk, egg, meat and wool pointing out that the country is a world leader in milk production but a lot still needs to be done to increase its productivity and productions of other livestock products. The developmental plans are extremely dependent upon livestock census data. He recalled that while doing an exercise for Planning Commission for the development of livestock in coming years, census data was the basic item on which all the planners based their calculations. The breed wise data collection in census of livestock is also very important and essential. According to him, since true identification of breed is a difficult task, the three dimensional pictures can be generated for each breed type as single two dimensional photograph will not be sufficient for identification of breed to be done by relatively less skilled data collectors. There are different types of breeds in different parts of the country with different local names, which will require to be taken into consideration. In the coming census, identification for counting those breeds of livestock that are popular and are driving the economy of a particular state/ union and also those that are threatened would be ideal. Only from collecting such data, one can know how much a specific breed is threatened or important. The scheme running for protecting the threatened breed will also be benefited by such database. There is another area, Dr. Bandopadhyay pointed out, that is equally important is the data on quantity of feed and fodder produced and areas falling under pastures and their current usages. The data gap in this sector are causing lot of confusion at planning stage. The data on common property resources for usage of fodder is also not available. There are similar kinds of data gaps observed in the vital sectors of breeding including success rate of AI programmes, impact of AI programme in the milk production. Data on Animal health sector in terms of number of animals suffering from different disease types are not adequate. Vaccines are in short supply but to what extent are not known. He viewed that ISS Scheme is giving 50% funding. The Animal Husbandry Sector falls under the State subject. Even then, Statistical Cells in the States are not adequately equipping themselves with the required manpower assigned for the scheme. The increased demands in Livestock Statistics will not be met if required manpower is not supplied and are not trained periodically.

           

2.      The agendawise discussion and decision taken therein are as follows:

 

 

Agenda 1: Action Taken Report of last TCD meeting held during 19 –20th September  2005.

 

The progress on various item was provided to participants The ATR was approved.

 

Agenda  2 : Release of  production estimates of milk, egg, wool and meat of the year 2005-06       

 

Dr. Vishnu Kant Srivastava Director DAHDF introduced the agenda and gave the brief background. He mentioned that in spite of reminders and also commitment by the states, we are not able to get the seasonal estimates from many of the states. On account of this, seasonal estimates could not be released on all India basis. However, aspiring for seasonal estimates, States/ UTs are now strengthened to provide annual estimates within the time frame with only  a little variation. The States/ UTs should make a little more effort so that the compilation and release of seasonal estimates, which is one of the basic objective of Integrated Sample Survey Scheme could also be achieved. He further mentioned that annexure attached to agenda notes provide the position of receipt/non receipt along with dates of receipt of seasonal estimates by State/UT. Advisor (Stats) mentioned that even if data of some village are not received, the provisional figures may be sent as per time schedule. The necessary changes may be intimated in the next seasonal report. Advisor (Stats ) again advised to send the progress report as per time schedule only. Dr. Srivastava mentioned that this time along with agenda notes, workbook was also supplied. The workbook contained the data on many items like targets, refresher training course, component wise breakups of 2005-06 production estimates of major livestock products and booklet containing the estimates of 2004-05 finalised in the last TCD meeting. It also contained a note on ISS scheme giving details of its progress during 10th five year plan and frequently occurring errors in computations of estimates for major livestock products based on conducted refresher training course for various States/ Unions for ISS Scheme. With the purpose of checking compilation error and also applying consistency checks amongst the season wise and annual estimates provided by the states and also annual estimates obtained by calculation, a worksheet of States/ Union data for the particular State/ Union was also distributed. One one-page-feedback form was also distributed giving the scope for participants to record their views about the estimates/ financial releases, targets for major livestock products for their States/ Unions. Commissioner Maharshtra Government mentioned that this was certainly a better approach.

 

There were detailed discussions for each of the State/UTs for the major livestock products. Most of the States had provided their estimates. J&K provided its projected values. It was observed that there was improbable jump in the milk production estimates of Bihar. Bihar explained it is due to shift of base year from 1982 to 2003 as there were no census results available over a period of time and estimates were kept on being built on 1982 Census database. There was however no explanation available why the change of base from 1982 census to current census of 2003 was not effected for the milk estimates of 2004-05, when almost all the States/ Unions had shifted their base in 2004-05. The evidence provided in the house explained that in Census 2003 the crossbred population has gone up and there is a structural change in the population of cows crossbred and non-descript which is causing such increase. The States, to whom the Bihar estimates were not agreeable on 5th October, agreed to the estimates after looking into the evidence. Thus, after the discussion, milk estimates of Bihar were accepted only provisionally by the house with the statement that the Bihar Government should check its estimates once again and an explanation justifying this rise may be provided in writing to the DAHDF countersigned by the Secretary of the Department of Government of Bihar within a fortnight. Mrs. Amarjeet Kaur Director (Dairy Development) suggested that Bihar should find the estimates of milk of previous years also basing it on 2003-Census in order to introspect to what extent variation were present in the old estimates. This exercise might give some reasonable justification about the causes of such increase. In the light of similar type of consistency from previous years’ estimates, the milk production estimates for Madhya Pradesh and Tamil Nadu also need confirmation and documentation of assignable causes effecting good increase. Dadra and Nagar Haveli estimates were not available. Component wise estimates of milk production were not available from the Jammu & Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh and Lakshdweep. 

           

Estimates of egg production were also discussed.  Extreme rise was noticed in estimates of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Nagaland and Daman Diu while shortfalls were noticed in those of Delhi, Arunachal Pradesh & Andaman & Nicobar. Dadra & Nagar Haveli estimates were not available for discussion. Uttar Pradesh pointed out that its estimate is 9227 lakh number and hence falls into its valid limit. Delhi explained its egg production has really gone down. The States/ UTs were told to find out the causes of such extreme rise and fall and intimate the same to DAHDF within a fortnight. The States/ UTs unavailable in the meeting should also send their comments within the fortnight if their estimates are showing the abnormal deviation from previous year. Bihar should send its explanation through its Departmental Secretary.

 

            Estimates of Meat production were discussed. Meat estimates of West Bengal were received during the TCD meeting. Projection for Meat production were received from the state of J&K and Arunachal Pradesh. The meat estimates from Goa, Sikkim, Rajasthan and Dadra & Nagar Haveli were not available. In case of Arunachal Pradesh, projection for meat production for 2005-06 is found to be not consistent with the values of 2004-05 but is consistent with the value of 2002-03. The Estimates of 2003-04 and 2004-05 are found to be consistent. Reasons were not available to explain this aspect of cyclical fluctuation in the meat estimates of Arunachal Pradesh. Such reasons should be explained by the State to DAHDF within a fortnight. Some States like West Bengal wanted their estimates to be considered coming from the recognized and unrecognized sector both as is done for Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu finds estimates from both the sectors on seasonal basis and disseminates the same also separately in every season of the year, whereas other States do not do so, hence it is not possible to classify the estimates of other states coming from both the sectors specially when the meat production is quite underestimated.

 

Meat estimates of the year 2003-04, which could not be finalized in earlier TCD meetings, as many states could not send their estimates, was also discussed during current TCD meeting and it is found that 12 States still did not send any of their estimates. By projecting their estimates based on estimates 2002-03 and 2004-05, which were already finalized in the previous TCD meetings, estimates at All India level for the year 2003-04 were finalised. These estimates were discussed and found within the consistent range. The estimates of meat production for the year 2003-04 are given in Annexure –VI. States marked “#” should send their estimates if available otherwise. The component wise estimates should also be sent by # sign marked States/UTs, within a fortnight so resolved.

 

Wool production has registered stability at national level when compared to last years’ estimates. In some of the states, wool production decreased very rapidly. They are Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh. At the same time, some states have shown increasing trend. Important ones are AP, Gujarat and JK. Punjab has also included wool production estimates from slaughterhouses which resulted in its higher increase in wool production, adjusting the same gives its trend going towards stabilization. The States of AP, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu provided their estimates in the meeting. The UP explained the reasons of decline of sheep population in its State. There is, according to them, direct competition between agriculture and sheep husbandry for land. The pastures meant for sheep husbandry is increasingly going towards production of cereals  UP being diverse in its geo-climatic setup ranging from high rain fed & water logging areas to dry plateau of Bundelkhand, Sheep rearing is generally shifting to Uttaranchal areas which can not be taken into the production estimates of the States after the formation of the separate state of Uttaranchal. UP is mainly producing now coarse type of wool fabrics whose market value is less. However, UP has now started improving its sheep breed for a better quality of wool and is targeting for a better production in coming years.

 

Number of Milch Animals for 2005-06 and those of 2004-05 were also discussed in the house. They are given at the Annexure –III and IV. The States marked “-“ were asked to provide their estimates within a fortnight,

 

Due to earlier TCD meetings remaining heavily loaded with the agenda of clearing the backlogs of old years estimates of major livestock products and operations of 17th livestock census work, the estimates of milch animals of in respect of old years 1999-00 to 2003-04 could not come up for discussion, the agenda was taken up during the current TCD meeting. The estimates were discussed and are given at Annexure –V. The estimates of 2003-04, as census is done in 2003 around the mid of period of 2003-04, are decided to be disseminated in place of ISS estimates. The States that had not reported their estimates for the period under reference (1999-00 to 2002-03) and hence are marked with “-“, were asked to provide the same within a fortnight.   

 

Agenda 3: 18th Livestock Census 2007

 

Shri Nand Lal Director took up the agenda of Livestock Census. It was informed that breed wise report of 17th Livestck Census is approved in the July 2006. The reference date of 18th livestock Census is fixed as 15th October 2007. The schedule for 18th Livestock Census was circulated. Items on financial allocation, remuneration to enumerators, computer based technology for data collection in the form of scanning were also discussed. Some of states were of the view that different payment norms should be kept for enumerators visiting rural areas and urban areas and similarly for those visiting the hilly and difficult terrains. Advisor gave details of Technically Advisory Committee meetings, which is right now looking at the schedule finalisation part of livestock census and told the house to send their suggestions to the department on all aspects of livestock census including training in identification of breeds within a fortnight. All the States/UTs were asked to mark their important breeds and prepare a write-up on it giving its salient features in brief, which is easy to understand. Such a write up should be sent to the Department so that instruction booklet on 18th livestock Census can be prepared.     

 

Agenda 4: Reappraisal of ISS methodologies

           

Dr. S.K. Bandopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DAHDF), Government of India (GOI) himself chaired this session. Dr. Vishnu Kant Srivastava Director has initiated the agenda. Under the changing scenario, the emphasis has been by the government to implement the cross breeding programmes in states to increase the production and quality of different livestock products and hence new breed has come up. In order to assess their performance, the following information need to be collected under these surveys :

 

a-                 Breed –wise milk yield of different species viz cattle, buffalo, goat

b-                Information on egg production from commercial poultry farms

c-                 Breed –wise wool yield from various centers or farms like sheep and wool extension centers, wool shearing centers and sheep breeding farms

d-                Information on broiler production and poultry meat.

 

There is an increasing tendency of not keeping both buffalo and cow. Therefore, the selection of households for buffalo or cow yield rates on the basis of frame of bovine population often selects households in such a way that yield rate of buffalo is completely missing in the sample in throughout the season. Therefore, it is required to create different frames for each of them.

 

Due to changes in the 18th Livestock Census schedule, ISS Scheme schedule will also need changes. 

 

Accordingly, there is a need for reappraisal of methodology being used under ISS Scheme.

 

States were asked to prepare a note on it and provide the same to the Department for incorporation of possible improvements, in the ISS Scheme for XI five year plan which is at formulation stage.

 

One immediate change in the randomization process at second stage unit (HouseHold) was deliberated. Randomization process through the “remainder method” at second stage unit (SSU) is a cumbersome process for the enumerators. By an example, it was shown as:  Say

 

Example –. Draw a Sample SRSWOR of 4 Households (HHs) from a list of 40 HHs. Let the 2 digit random numbers be 32, 78, 68, 91, 53, 01,23, 03.

 

Method-1 The sample will be { (32),(78),(68),(91),(53), (01), (23) and (03)}; rejecting if it is > 40.

 

Method-2 The sample will be { (32),(38),(28),(91) (as > 80),(13) }; rejecting only if it is > highest multiple of 40 below 99

 

 

The method-2 (the remainder method) is economical to method-1, whereas method-1 is easy to operate. The method –2 is employed in Integrated Sample Survey (ISS) at FSU as well as at SSU level. The method is useful for FSUs (i.e. for villages selection), because economy really matters there but for SSU ( selection of HHs, ) the Method –1 is a better option as it is easy for the data collectors to operate the procedure in the field. The House accepted the procedure for second stage units.

 

Agenda 5 XI Five year Plan proposals for ISS Scheme

           

The progress of ISS Scheme during 10th five year plan was reviewed. AHC chaired the session. Studies are becoming important day by day in order to bridge data gaps. Advisor mentioned that the proposals for studies should be sent to the department. It was also pointed out that Dr. Bandopadhyay, Animal Husbandry Commissioner (AHC) in his keynote address, had enumerated some of the studies filling the various existing data gaps in livestock sector and the States/UTs might choose some of them for doing studies to fill the data gaps.

 

The scheme’s component on IT Solution was also discussed. It was told to the states that if the money in respect of IT solution component was not utilized, the States were to utilize it within a month else in the third release of current year their funds for IT solution would be adjusted against their salary component because of it being the last year of 10th five year plan. The benefits accruing due to this component of the scheme would then not be available for them. Some of States like Jharkhand responded and promised that money would be used.

 

Speaking on XI five year plan proposals for ISS Scheme, Shri Bijay Kumar Commissioner Maharashtra suggested that future plan should seek solution in web based technology as it gives more speed and control over data. ISS scheme should strive for it. He also suggested that in order to have a larger maneuverability in results retrieved through such processes the spread sheet adaptability should be ensured for such systems.

 

Agenda 6 Human Resource Development –State/UTs Statistical Cell

 

            Strengthening the Animal Husbandry Statistical Unit in States/ Unions for the creation of robust Statistical Systems, refresher training for the enumerators, tabulators, supervisors and creations of purposive bonds between them and their indigenous resources available in the forms of institutes of repute/experts/ resource persons in the field Animal Husbandry Statistics is very essential. The house deliberated on this aspect. The States like Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Kerala, Orissa, Gujarat, Chattisgarh and Maharashtra that had already undergone the refresher-training course presented their papers. The views of States were that such training should be conducted periodically in the gap of around 2 to 3 years. These training are very useful as they renew the commitments in the staff besides refreshing their skills. Gujarat felt the survey tool kit should be distributed in the training and enumerators should also be trained in managerial skills of probing, protecting from various occupational hazards, because data collection in ISS Scheme is done by actually camping in the villages and round the year. In order to avoid injuries while doing such activities, the data collectors should be trained periodically. A paper on ISS Scheme, its frequently occurring errors and possible solutions based on already conducted refresher training course for various States/UTs was also presented by Dr Srivastava Director DAHDF 

 

Agenda 7 : Any other item with the permission of Chair

The following items had been discussed and their background notes were also circulated in the workbook and/ or agenda –notes. Decisions arrived are summarized below.

 

1Targets of Major Livestock Products

2Training in ISS methodologies, held till now and proposals in offing

3Difficulties and Possible Solutions of ISS Scheme

4Infrastructure data

5Randomisation process of ISS Scheme

6Schedule of 18th Livestock Census

7Frequently occurring computational errors in ISS methodologies

8Progress of ISS Scheme during 10th five year plan

9Milk, Dung and Egg Utilisation at national level

10 Studies under ISS Scheme during 10th Five year Plan.

11.IT Solutions funds non-utilisation

 

 

            The milk, egg, dung utilization at national level is not being computed because its primary table across all the States/UTs are not prepared or disseminated in uniform pattern. A format is circulated and it is urged that from 2005-06 onwards this data should be prepared and provided to DAHDF in the prescribed format only to enable the DAHDF build the estimates also at national level. However, for old years from 1999-00 to 2004-05, the simple utilization pattern may be provided to DAHDF, which could be considered for disseminating only the State/UT specific utilization patterns, only after examining it across 2005-06 results so tabulated.. 

 

Infrastructure data was circulated and it was approved. The States/UTs were asked to provide the AI data for the years, they had not reported till the time. The table is given at Annexure –VII.

 

 

3.      Recommendations of TCD Pune 2006

 

1)                 All the States/ UTs will prepare a brief note  of their suggestions, problems and possible solutions in respect of Integrated Sample Survey Scheme (ISS) for their possible inclusion into the ISS Scheme meant for XI five year plan. They will also tell if the scheme is required for their state.

2)                 All the States /UTs will send the list, photographs and detailed characteristics of the important breeds of animals, only of their area, preferably to the maximum of ten unless it is imperative to have more than ten.

3)                 The estimate of major livestock products for the year 2005-06, as given in Anne –I and II  are approved  except for milk production estimates of Bihar, which are accepted provisionally. Bihar should confirm its milk production estimates and document the possible reasons for such high increase. The same, countersigned with the Department Secretary of the State may be sent to DAHDF within a fortnight.

4)                 Estimators reflecting higher increase or decline may be documented for its  possible reasons and the same should be sent to DAHDF. The States/UTs that had not provided the component wise estimates should send them to the DAHDF within a fortnight. Annexure VIII gives the actions expected, summarized in tabular form for the agenda items, by the concerned States/ UTs. The concerned States/UTs may take the action accordingly and DAHDF should be informed within a fortnight.

5)                 It was decided that after receipt of clarification/ justification of the production estimates from concerned States/UTs, Adviser (Statistics) may approve them for further release at All India level.

6)                 All the States/ UTs whose milch animals estimates are still awaited, given in Annexure –III, IV, V may send the same within a fortnight.

7)                 The willing States/ UTs will send the requirement and plan of refresher training course in ISS methodologies for their States/ UTs within October.

8)                 The Studies proposal by the willing States/ UTs may be sent to DAHDF by November 15, 2006.

 

 

The meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann -I  : Estimates of Milk, Egg and Meat @  Production for

2005-06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Milk

 

Egg

 

Meat@

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State

(000 MT)

 

(Lakhs Nos)

 

(000 Tns)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

7624

 

164534

 

457

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

48

#

73

#

20

#

3

Assam

747

 

5359

 

27

 

4

Bihar

5060

@

10012

 

176

 

5

Chhattisgarh

839

 

8875

 

4

 

6

Goa

56

 

146

 

-

 

7

Gujarat

6960

 

5775

 

18

 

8

Haryana

5299

 

15125

 

73

 

9

Himachal Pradesh

869

 

753

 

3

 

10

Jammu & Kashmir

1400

#

6320

#

27

#

11

Jharkhand

1335

 

6970

 

43

 

12

Karnataka

4022

 

18348

 

100

 

13

Kerala

2063

 

11956

 

56

 

14

Madhya Pradesh

6283

 

9414

 

19

 

15

Maharashtra

6769

 

35227

 

236

 

16

Manipur

77

 

835

 

23

 

17

Meghalaya

73

 

973

 

37

 

18

Mizoram

15

 

326

 

9

 

19

Nagaland

74

 

868

 

63

 

20

Orissa

1342

 

12787

 

52

 

21

Punjab

8909

 

35200

 

4

 

22

Rajasthan

8713

 

7029

 

-

 

23

Sikkim

48

 

146

 

-

 

24

Tamil Nadu

5474

 

62225

 

119

**

25

Tripura

87

 

1100

 

12

*

26

Uttar Pradesh

17356

 

9228

 

198

 

27

Uttaranchal

1206

 

1873

 

6

 

28

West Bengal

3891

 

29637

 

487

 

29

A&N Islands

20

 

477

 

0

 

30

Chandigarh

46

 

280

 

1

 

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

-

 

-

 

-

 

32

Daman & Diu

1

 

11

 

-

 

33

Delhi

310

 

196

 

31

 

34

Lakshadweep

2

#

124

#

-

 

35

Pondicherry

43

 

105

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total

97061

 

462307

 

2310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- NA

 

                        ** unregistered sector also included. # projected

@ The milk production of Bihar is considered abnormal due to phenomenal growth of about 70 %. The estimate should be again examined and reasons the same to be provided.

 

 

Ann -II Estmates of wool production for the year 2005-06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Wool

 

Wool from

 

 

Srl.

States/ UTs

Production

 

sources others

 

 

No.

 

(000 Kg)

 

(000 Kgs)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

3978

#

-

 

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

14

#

-

 

 

3

Bihar

220

 

-

 

 

4

Chhattisgarh

244

 

-

 

 

5

Gujarat

3123

 

-

 

 

6

Haryana

1136

 

-

 

 

7

Himachal Pradesh

1603

#

2

$

 

8

Jammu & Kashmir

7400

#

-

 

 

9

Jharkhand

150

 

-

 

 

10

Karnataka

5598

 

-

 

 

11

Madhya Pradesh

431

 

-

 

 

12

Maharashtra

1640

 

-

 

 

13

Punjab

712

 

150

$$

 

14

Rajasthan

15405

 

-

 

 

15

Sikkim

2

 

-

 

 

16

Tamil Nadu

750

#

-

 

 

17

Uttar Pradesh

1459

 

-

 

 

18

Uttaranchal

353

 

-

 

 

19

West Bengal

666

#

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total

44884

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$   Farms production

 

#   projected

 

 

$$  Wool production from slaughter houses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-III:    Estmates of  annual average milch animals  for 2005-06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cows

Buffaloes

Goats

 

States/ UTs

Exotic

ND

 

 

 

 

(in 000)

(in 000)

(in 000)

(in 000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

-

-

-

-

2

Arunachal Pradesh

5

50

-

-

3

Assam

204

2520

233

973

4

Bihar

743

3853

3052

-

5

Chhattisgarh

66

2336

295

1260

6

Goa

-

-

-

-

7

Gujarat

229

2191

4334

3005

8

Haryana

-

-

-

-

9

Himachal Pradesh

348

511

487

814

10

Jammu & Kashmir

-

-

-

-

11

Jharkhand

65

1759

358

-

12

Karnataka

936

2561

2262

2660

13

Kerala

930

149

21

495

14

Madhya Pradesh

140

5828

4141

4413

15

Maharashtra

-

-

-

-

16

Manipur

25

90

25

-

17

Meghalaya

-

-

-

-

18

Mizoram

5

7

2

-

19

Nagaland

31

17

3

16

20

Orissa

466

3481

412

143

21

Punjab

922

155

3866

-

22

Rajasthan

151

4114

5280

10302

23

Sikkim

-

-

-

-

24

Tamil Nadu

2405

1280

772

-

25

Tripura

-

-

-

-

26

Uttar Pradesh

-

-

-

-

27

Uttaranchal

106

611

711

-

28

West Bengal

774

5629

219

5564

29

A&N Islands

-

21

7

25

30

Chandigarh

-

1

18

-

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

-

-

-

-

32

Daman & Diu

0.07

1

0.48

2

33

Delhi

-

-

-

-

34

Lakshadweep

-

-

-

-

35

Pondicherry

-

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

8550

37166

26500

29671

 

 

 - still awaited

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-IV:    Estmates of  annual average milch animals  for 2004-05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cows

Buffaloes

Goats

 

States/ UTs

Exotic

ND

 

 

 

 

(in 000)

(in 000)

(in 000)

(in 000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

474

1900

4876

-

2

Arunachal Pradesh

4

45

-

-

3

Assam

194

2535

227

983

4

Bihar

128

3754

3069

-

5

Chhattisgarh

65

2313

281

1200

6

Goa

-

-

-

-

7

Gujarat

215

2195

4243

3020

8

Haryana

-

-

-

-

9

Himachal Pradesh

342

535

505

850

10

Jammu & Kashmir

787

715

341

1096

11

Jharkhand

-

1664

352

4698

12

Karnataka

922

2553

2260

2661

13

Kerala

936

154

22

478

14

Madhya Pradesh

131

6776

4680

3965

15

Maharashtra

1545

4720

3773

-

16

Manipur

26

93

29

-

17

Meghalaya

17

221

5

-

18

Mizoram

4

7

2

-

19

Nagaland

28

16

2

14

20

Orissa

453

3511

406

128

21

Punjab

923

161

3976

-

22

Rajasthan

119

4231

5332

9959

23

Sikkim

-

-

-

-

24

Tamil Nadu

1288

1838

1236

-

25

Tripura

-

-

-

-

26

Uttar Pradesh

850

5627

10228

6257

27

Uttaranchal

104

611

708

-

28

West Bengal

729

5533

219

5525

29

A&N Islands

-

-

-

-

30

Chandigarh

5

1

15

-

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

-

-

-

-

32

Daman & Diu

-

-

-

-

33

Delhi

31

17

113

-

34

Lakshadweep

0.48

4

-

60

35

Pondicherry

26

3

2

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

10349

51733

46901

18257

 

 

 - still awaited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-V

 Number of Milch Animals in 000

 

 

 

Page 1/3

Sl.

STATE

 

Year

1999-2000

 

 

Year

2000-01

 

No.

 

Cows Exotic

Non- Descrpt

Buffalo

Goat

Cows Exotic

Non- Descrpt

Buffalo

Goat

1

Andhra Pradesh

225

2313

4647

 

324

2410

5092

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

Assam

160.932

2625.851

211.094

 

167.162

2195.032

211.747

 

4

Bihar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Chhattisgarh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

Goa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

Gujarat

142.439

2045

3481.5

2885

138.959

2168.2

3761.2

3020.3

8

Haryana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

Himachal Pradesh

127.028

573.439

476.77

980.205

119.527

560.109

450.634

965.261

10

Jammu & Kashmir

787.2

529.8

495.9

1004.4

827.5

907.6

500.4

1013

11

Jharkhand

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

Karnataka

604.1

3093

2377.2

2536.691

654.9

3124

2462.2

3019.1

13

Kerala

1179.3

338.5

43.4

741

1238.8

284.1

40.2

796.4

14

Madhya Pradesh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

Maharashtra

933

4280

3150

 

964

4290

3150

 

16

Manipur

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

Meghalaya

13

189.4

6.8

 

14.2

211.6

7.2

 

18

Mizoram

5.416

10.94

4.58

 

4.213

9.36

2.864

 

19

Nagaland

21.14

14.25

3.95

 

23.41

15.1

4.15

 

20

Orissa

334

3503

325

106

332

3510

339

109

21

Punjab

883.773

287.432

3533.849

 

824.492

287.432

3635.444

 

22

Rajasthan

45

4585

4263

7482

46

4400

4294

7811

23

Sikkim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

Tamil Nadu

892.7

2169.1

1951.7

 

994.3

1913

1925.4

 

25

Tripura

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

Uttar Pradesh

622

5591

9321

5700

650

5591

9593

6107

27

Uttaranchal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

West Bengal

542

4870

217

5327

575

4913

217

5366

29

A&N Islands

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

Chandigarh

4.302

0.454

17.234

 

4.773

0.454

15.127

 

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

Daman & Diu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

Delhi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

Lakshadweep

0.163

0.302

0

30.238

0.169

0.308

0

30.286

35

Pondicherry

28.814

3.427

2.616

 

29.374

2.367

1.995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

7551

37023

34530

26793

7933

36793

35704

28237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Blank- still awaited

 

 0 negligible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-V ( contd. )  --

 Number of Milch Animals in 000

 

 

Page 2/3

Sl.

STATE

 

Year

2001-02

 

 

Year

2002-03

 

No.

 

Cows Exotic

Non- Descrpt

Buffalo

Goat

Cows Exotic

Non- Descrpt

Buffalo

Goat

1

Andhra Pradesh

341

2465

5192

 

421

3133

5512

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

Assam

179.944

2348.208

223.917

 

207.142

2514.297

231.952

 

4

Bihar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Chhattisgarh

55

1207

243

1068

59

1284

259

1136

6

Goa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

Gujarat

162.543

2178.6

4154.5

2903.8

170.944

2178.7

4103.9

2980.3

8

Haryana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

Himachal Pradesh

138.281

618.883

487.407

1145.142

145.291

658.616

491.907

1204.604

10

Jammu & Kashmir

872.4

898.1

509

1047.2

894.3

880.9

513.5

1055.1

11

Jharkhand

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

Karnataka

740.8

3139.2

2460

3074.6

715.6

2952.9

2415.8

2865.3

13

Kerala

1269.8

221.6

36.7

801.7

1077.8

245.5

26.7

662

14

Madhya Pradesh

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

Maharashtra

1240

4630

3600

 

1250

4680

3660

 

16

Manipur

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

Meghalaya

15.4

209.7

4

 

15.2

212

5.3

 

18

Mizoram

4.478

9.273

2.902

 

4.677

9.355

2.484

 

19

Nagaland

22.35

15.35

4.48

 

24.36

15.82

4.8

 

20

Orissa

335

3488

376

108

352

3412

381

110

21

Punjab

867.365

261.85

3666.345

 

872.438

218.606

5803.857

 

22

Rajasthan

57

4393

3921

7726

62

5937

4311

9823

23

Sikkim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

Tamil Nadu

994.3

1913

1925.4

 

1058.4

2085

1309.6

 

25

Tripura

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

Uttar Pradesh

766

5404

9702

5943

816

5487

9906

6080

27

Uttaranchal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

West Bengal

611

5255

218

5445

688

5439

218

5485

29

A&N Islands

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

Chandigarh

4.82

0.454

16.258

 

4.969

0.47

15.316

 

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

Daman & Diu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

Delhi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

Lakshadweep

0.171

0.319

0

30.322

0.173

0.325

0

30.364

35

Pondicherry

27.221

2.734

2.531

 

26.684

2.71

2.411

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

8705

38659

36745

29293

8866

41347

39175

31432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Blank- still awaited

 

 0 negligible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-V ( contd. )  --

 Number of Milch Animals in 000

 

Page 3/3

Sl.

STATE

 

Year

2003- Census Values

 

No.

 

Cows Exotic

Non- Descrpt

Buffalo

Goat

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

475

1934

5227

3422

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

5

111

5

98

 

3

Assam

161

2035

199

1144

 

4

Bihar

569

2840

2678

4400

 

5

Chhattisgarh

67

2313

280

1201

 

6

Goa

6

17

16

5

 

7

Gujarat

318

2120

3938

2668

 

8

Haryana

262

309

2726

297

 

9

Himachal Pradesh

334

479

466

653

 

10

Jammu & Kashmir

543

598

543

1153

 

11

Jharkhand

70

1830

390

2449

 

12

Karnataka

903

2500

2216

2597

 

13

Kerala

791

152

18

436

 

14

Madhya Pradesh

136

5704

4055

4282

 

15

Maharashtra

1390

3532

3476

5852

 

16

Manipur

23

78

22

13

 

17

Meghalaya

15

215

5

110

 

18

Mizoram

4

7

2

7

 

19

Nagaland

87

50

7

67

 

20

Orissa

385

3235

358

2727

 

21

Punjab

741

124

3106

154

 

22

Rajasthan

235

4248

5222

11581

 

23

Sikkim

33

26

1

43

 

24

Tamil Nadu

2353

1341

792

4059

 

25

Tripura

25

215

6

223

 

26

Uttar Pradesh

642

4901

10378

5932

 

27

Uttaranchal

99

595

682

649

 

28

West Bengal

489

5293

247

7460

 

29

A&N Islands

5

15

6

25

 

30

Chandigarh

3

0

15

0

 

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

1

5

2

12

 

32

Daman & Diu

0

1

0

2

 

33

Delhi

32

20

139

9

 

34

Lakshadweep

1

0

0

22

 

35

Pondicherry

28

7

2

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

11231

46855

47224

63776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Blank- still awaited

 

 0 negligible

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annexure -VI Meat@ Estimates for the year 2003-04

 

 

 

Meat Est

Meat Est.

Meat Est.

 

 

 

of

of

of

 

 

State/ UTs

2004-05

2002-03

2003-04

 

 

 

(000 Tns)

(000 Tns)

(000 Tns)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

451

398

447

 

2

Arunachal Pradesh

8

19

9

 

3

Assam

25

21

23

 

4

Bihar

175

174

174

#

5

Chhattisgarh

4

4

4

 

6

Goa

-

1

4

 

7

Gujarat

13

10

11

 

8

Haryana

9

9

9

 

9

Himachal Pradesh

3

3

3

 

10

Jammu & Kashmir

-

27

27

 

11

Jharkhand

42.685

39.460

41.073

#

12

Karnataka

99

96

97

 

13

Kerala

87

168

87

 

14

Madhya Pradesh

16

10

15

 

15

Maharashtra

230

220

225

 

16

Manipur

23

22

22

#

17

Meghalaya

36

33

36

 

18

Mizoram

9

8

9

 

19

Nagaland

61

24

26

 

20

Orissa

51

45

45

 

21

Punjab

4

6

5

#

22

Rajasthan

64

59

63

 

23

Sikkim

-

0

0

#

24

Tamil Nadu**

85

40

47

 

25

Tripura

9

0

4

#

26

Uttar Pradesh

190

181

187

 

27

Uttaranchal

5.815

8.350

7.083

#

28

West Bengal

475

450

462

 

29

A&N Islands

0

1

1

 

30

Chandigarh

1

1

1

 

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

-

0

0

#

32

Daman & Diu

0

0

0

#

33

Delhi

31

32

32

 

34

Lakshadweep

0

0

0

#

35

Pondicherry

3

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

2211

2113

2129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* in Tripura poultry meat consists of broiler production and production from ducks also

 ** Unregistered sector also included.

 

 

 

 

 

@ meat productiom from registered sector unless specified otherwise.

 

 

 

 

 

Ann-VII:  No. of Artificial Inseminations Performed during 1997-98 to 2005-06 ( 000 numbers)

Srl

 

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

NO.

States/UTs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Andhra Pradesh

1942

2055

2328

2562

2670

2962

3104

3358

3404

2

Arunachal Pradesh

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

Assam

44

31

35

49

91

88

109

-

-

4

Bihar

-

45

13

22

26

45

59

-

-

5

Chattishgarh

72

89

85

87

122

151

270

-

-

6

Goa

6

7

7

7

9

9

11

11

10

7

Gujarat

488

521

540

618

645

776

717

402

578

8

Haryana

578

512

475

562

802

899

935

1212

1422

9

Himachal Pradesh

377

404

412

406

394

416

419

453

498

10

Jammu & Kashmir

-

154

147

146

160

177

207

-

-

11

Jharkhand

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

12

Karnataka

-

1365

1533

1630

1867

2046

2108

-

-

13

Kerala

-

3567

3641

3991

1249

1369

1231

-

-

14

Madhya Pradesh

-

261

265

286

292

345

398

473

597

15

Maharashtra

1563

1769

1944

1785

1960

1960

3425

-

-

16

Manipur

12

16

13

8

15

10

40

-

-

17

Meghalaya

22

22

20

22

29

24

26

28

26

18

Mizoram

3

4

4

6

6

5

5

5

5

19

Nagaland

4

4

3

5

5

5

30

-

-

20

Orissa

596

604

478

472

334

449

497

594

654

21

Punjab

1908

1947

2108

1914

2229

2743

3012

2773

2834

22

Rajasthan

605

641

638

595

638

702

877

968

1057

23

Sikkim

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

24

Tamil Nadu

2682

2966

3147

3235

3235

3228

3102

2923

3287

25

Tripura

79

72

65

61

63

64

66

67

78

26

Uttaranchal

-

-

-

-

92

97

109

-

-

27

Uttar Pradesh

2845

2936

2498

1531

1703

1736

1784

2194

2334

28

West Bengal

-

668

744

1200

1006

1076

1183

-

-

29

A & N Islands

4

4

5

6

7

8

9

-

-

30

Chandigarh

10

9

10

10

10

9

8

9

9

31

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

32

Daman & Diu

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

33

Delhi

-

13

12

13

12

13

14

17

16

34

Lakshadweep

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

35

Pondicherry

94

98

89

96

96

105

80

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

13936

20784

21260

21324

19766

21519

23835

15487

16809

 

- NA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annexure VIII - Actions required by the States /UTs for PUNE TCD 2006

Srl. No.

Item

States/UT

 required actions

1

Milk 2005-06

 

 

 

1. Bihar

Confirm & document reasons

Reasons countersigned may

 

 

be sent to DAHDF.

 

 

2.TN & MP

Possible reasons of increase in Milk Production may be sent

 

3. Arunachal Pradesh, JK, Lakshdweep:-

 

 

 

Componentwise estimates should be provided.

 

4. Dadra & Nagar Haveli:-

 

 

 

Estimates may be provided.

 

2

Egg 2005-06

 

 

 

1. Bihar, Gujarat, Nagaland, Daman & Diu:-

 

 

 

Possible reasons of increase in Egg Production may be sent

 

2. Arunachal Pradesh, Delhi, A&N Island:-

 

 

 

Possible reasons of decline in Egg Production may be sent

 

3. Arunachal Pradesh, JK, Lakshdweep:-

 

 

 

Componentwise estimates should be provided.

 

4. Dadra & Nagar Haveli:-

 

 

 

Estimates may be provided.

 

3

Meat 2005-06

 

 

 

1. Arunachal Pradesh, JK:-

 

 

 

Componentwise estimates should be provided.

 

2. Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

 

Resons for cyclical fluctuation may be provided.

 

3. Rajasthan, Sikkim, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu & Lakshdweep:-

 

 

Estimates may be provided.

 

4

Meat 2003-04

 

 

 

1. All the States whose estimates are marked # in Annexure VI.

 

 

Componentwise estimates should be provided.

5

Wool 2005-06

 

 

 

1. Bihar, MP, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

 

Possible reasons of decline in wool Production may be sent

 

2. AP, Gujarat, JK

 

 

 

Possible reasons of increase in wool Production may be sent

 

3.AP, Arunachal Pradesh, HP, JK, TN & WB:-

 

 

 

Componentwise estimates should be provided.

6

Milch 2005-06, Milch 2004-05

 

 

States whose estimates are marked "-"

 

 

 

They may send their estimates, if applicable..

7

Milch 1999-00 to 2002-03

 

 

States whose estimates are Blank

 

 

 

They may send their estimates, if applicable..

8

Milk, Egg & Dung 2005-06 Utilisation in the prescribed format

 

All States:-

 

 

 

 

May send it. In case of not avaialble, NIL reply may be sent.

9

Refresher Training Course for ISS methodologies:

 

States: Bihar, Jharkhand, Punjab, Uttaranchal, A&N, D&N Haveli,Delhi

 

 

Plans are still awaited. May send them.

10

Artificial Insemination data

 

 

All States whose data in Annexure VII is marked "-" under 2004-05 & 2005-06

 

 

Provide the same if applicable.

 

Appendix-A

 

List of participants in the Meeting of the Technical Committee of Directions for improvement of Animal Husbandry & Dairying Statistics held on 05-06.10.2006 at VMNICOM, University Road, PUNE.

 

Sl. No.

Name of the participants

Designation

1

Ms Charusheela Sohoni

Secretary DAHDF, GOI

2

Dr. S.K. Bandyopadhyay

Animal Husbandry Commissioner GOI

3

Smt. Leena Mehendale,

Principal Secretary, ADF, GO Maharashtra

4

Shri Arun Saxena, Co-Chairmen,TCD

Advisor (Stat.), DAH&D,GOI

5

Professor S.A. Siddhanti

Head of the Center VMNICOM Pune

6

Shri Bijay Kumar

Commissioner, A.H., GO Maharashtra

Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries Government of India

7.

Smt. Amarjeet Kaur

Director (DD)

8

Dr.Vishnu Kant Srivastava

Director (AHS)

9

Smt Shobha Marwah

Director (Fy)

10

Shri. Nand Lal

Joint Director (AHS)

11

Dr Chandramani Sharma

Deputy Director (AHS)

12

Shri J.K. Maurya

Economic Officer

13

Shri. Gurbax Singh

Statistical Investigator

Vaikunth Mehta National Institute of Co-operative Management

14

Dr.S.Y.Deshpande

Assistant Prof. VMNICOM Pune

Central Statistical Organisation

15

Dr. J. Yadav

Director

National Informatics Centre

16

Dr. Brij Bhushan

Technical Director , NIC N.Delhi

17

Smt Sardesai

Technical Director , NIC Pune

National Dairy Development Board

18

Dr. C.L. Dadhich

Sr. General Manager

19

Dr.T.N.Dutta

Specialist III, NDDB, Anand

College of Veterinary Sciences, Shirwal, Pune

20

Dr. S.G.Narayankhedkar

Dean, KNP Veterinary College

Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Maharashtra

21

Shri A.M.Jadhav

Additional Director

Directorate of Fisheries, Maharashtra

22

Shri Vilas Gawali

Deputy Director

23

Shri H.K.Bage

Statistical Assistant

Maharashtra Livestock Development Board

24

Dr. D.M. Chavan

Chief Executive Officer

25

Dr. K.C.Sharma

Livestock Development Officer

States/UTs Department of Animal Husbandry & Dairying/ Veterinary Services

 

26

Shri

Mohammed Deen

Commissioner & Secretary

Jammu & Kashmir

27

Shri

Narendra Kumar

Development Commissioner

Delhi

28

Shri

P.Sharat Chandra

Commissioner

Manipur

29

Dr.

L.Mohan

Director

Andhra pradesh

30

Dr.

Th. Dorendra Singh

Director

Manipur

31

Dr.

D.Khonglah

Director

Meghalaya

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

Dr.

K.L.Khurana

Director

NCT of Delhi

33

Shri

C.P Meshram

Addl. Commissioner

Maharashtra

34

Dr.

P.Gabriel

Additional Director

Tamil Nadu

35

Dr.

K.A.Naveen

Vet. Assist. Surgeon

A&Nicobar Island

36

Dr.

R. Mahadevan

Assistant Director

Andhra pradesh

37

Dr.

Hage Tabin

Deputy Director

Arunachal Pradesh

38

Shri

Krishna Murari Prasad

Assistant Director

Bihar

39

Shri

Amanjot Singh

Research officer

Chandigarh

40

Shri

Vishwanath Verma

Assistant Director

Chattishgarh

41

Dr

D.R.P. Menezes

Assistant Director

Goa

42

Dr.

M.R.Patel

Joint Director

Gujarat

43

Shri

Satish Chander Mohan

Deputy Director

Haryana

44

Dr.

B.P.Malhotra

Joint Director

Himachal Pradesh

45

Dr

Bindeshwari Choudhary

Joint Director

Jharkhand

46

Smt.

J.Vijanna

Joint Director

Kerala

47

Dr.

Rakesh Kumar Sharma

Under Secreatry

Madhya Pradesh

48

Shri

S.N.Mishra

Assistant Statistical Officer

Madhya Pradesh

49

Shri

R.G.Thakur

Assistant Director

Madhya Pradesh

50

Shri

R.C.Shukla

Assistant Statistical Officer

Madhya Pradesh

51

Dr.

M.G.Gatte

Deputy Commissioner

Maharashtra

52

Dr.

Th. Debendra Kumar

Deputy Director

Manipur

53

Shri

T.Marbaniang

Dy.Director(Statistics)

Meghalaya

54

Dr.

Saingura Sailo

Joint Director

Mizoram

55

Shri

Lianmawia

Research Officer

Mizoram

56

Dr.

P. Bhujaga Rao

Joint Director

Pondicherry

57

Dr.

Vijaya Kumar

Dy. Chief Executive Officer

Punjab

58

Dr.

Teja Ram

Deputy Director

Rajasthan

59

Dr.

J. Datta

Assistant Director

Tripura

60

Dr.

P.S.Gautam

Joint Director

Uttar Pradesh

61

Dr.

R.P. Bahuguna

Joint Director

Uttaranchal

62

Dr.

P.K.Bhattacharya

Joint Director

West Bengal

63

Dr.

V.G.Ramteke

Joint Commissioner

Maharashtra

64

Dr.

B.M.Bhuktar

Joint Commissioner

Maharashtra

65

Shri

S.M.Bhabhale

Deputy Director

Maharashtra

66

Dr.

S.N.Gumble

Assistant Commissioner

Maharashtra

67

Dr

R.S.Palimkar

L.D.O

Maharashtra

68

Shri

S.D.Joshi

S.A.

Maharashtra

69

Dr.

Ch. Srinivasa Raju

Field Officer

Andhra Pradesh

70

Shri

P.S.Borah

Statistical Inspector

Arunachal Pradesh

71

Shri

Ramesh Sharma

Deputy Superintendant

Bihar

72

Shri

Gurudas J. Gaundalkar

Statistical Officer

Goa

73

Shri

Ishwari Singh

Statistical Assistant

Himachal Pradesh

74

Shri

Maheswar Mohanty

Sr. Statistician

Orissa

75

Dr.

Sanjeev Kumar Sharme

ICC

Uttar Pradesh

76

Shri

Naresh Mohan Naithani

Field Officer

Uttaranchal